CEO and NGO Catholics

Faithful Catholics have long derided what are known as CEO Catholics: Christmas and Easter Only. It is easy to conclude one is not really a Catholic if one only comes to Mass twice a year, when everybody goes to whatever church they belong to, if only to be seen going to church or because it is a nice thing to do as a family. There is another acronym-ic Catholic that is just as false: the NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) Catholic.

In the season of Lent, we are asked to commit to greater depth in our prayers, our fasting, and our almsgiving. Prayers and fasting are interior practices, but almsgiving rapidly shifts our focus to the recipients of our monetary gifts. That external focus may lead us away from the purpose of almsgiving: the reason the Church asks us to engage in almsgiving is to bless us, the givers. The recipient is also blessed, but that is not the primary reason to give money during Lent.

Continue reading “CEO and NGO Catholics”

The McCarrick Effect

Some time ago, a bishop on Twitter tried to put me in my place by reminding me he had been a priest and bishop for more than 30 years. Instead of making a real argument, he chose the common social media debate strategy of intimidation and rebuke. This particular priest and bishop is a good man, and a good priest, and no doubt a good bishop. He has been seeking his God his entire life, and he has in his ministry as priest and bishop been seeking to draw others to God.

Twitter is a social medium that invites participants to give into the temptation of malice and wrath rather than to build up the kingdom of God through charity and truth. Though I thought he had a poor argument, I chose not to respond to the Bishop’s rebuke, but gave him a like to indicate my affection and respect for him.

In a more deliberate social medium, I might have chosen to pursue my argument in the discussion, but Twitter is not any good at deliberation. It is an exclamatory platform. In this social medium, where the author can collect and present his view with more deliberation, I am responding to the ad verecundiam material fallacy used by the good Bishop. The Bishop said he had been a priest and bishop for more than 30 years, but an appeal to authority and power and reputation no longer works since the laicization of Theodore McCarrick. McCarrick had been a priest and bishop for 60 years, and is no longer either because he was exposed as a deeply wicked man. McCarrick has obliterated for all priests and bishops any reliance on a man’s office as proof of his argument.

Based on this Bishop’s use of his office and ordination as the effective tool for argumentation, I fear that the lesson of McCarrick has not yet been learned by most of the presbyteral and episcopal ranks. The truly good bishops and priests will be those who decline to be called Monsignor or Your Excellency but only Father. The McCarrick effect is to have destroyed in the minds of the faithful any reason to trust and believe in the officeholder by virtue of the office he holds.

The renewal of the church will come about with the renewal of the priestly caste. Holy men, humble men, men lacking ambition who see their priesthood as a ministry of sacramental service rather than a career ladder they may be able to climb, will be the beacon of the light of Christ that the Christian faithful will follow through the darkness of the world.

We should pray that all priests, and all bishops, learn the lesson of McCarrick and reorient their ministries to be less about their office and more about their message. When our Lord sent out the 70 disciples, he sent them with a message rather than with an office. May all our disciples be guided by that example.

Letter from a Suffering Church

Bishop Robert Barron just wrote a short book, Letter to a Suffering Church, in which he confesses the sins of the clergy and shows this is a regular pattern in church history.

He encourages us to stay and fight for holiness in the Church and its clergy. As a permanent deacon, I am a member of the clergy, though ordained only to service. As an investment professional, I am quite familiar how the priests and the bishops are seen by the faithful. It’s not good.

Clericalism is frequently listed as a primary reason for unholiness amongst the clergy, but clericalism seems to mean whatever the speaker wants it to mean. So let me speak plainly to a good bishop and priest and formator of priests (we have many Mundelein guys here, and not a dud in the bunch) about the root problem.

Continue reading “Letter from a Suffering Church”